clear clear clear clear clear
clear
  
Movies
   Scoops & News

Neel Masson clears Copyright Act Amendments' misconceptions



June 18, 2012 04:09:33 PM IST
By Glamsham Editorial
Send to Friend

The Copyright Amendment Act, which was notified lately, has been a hot topic of discussion in the industry circles, especially the music industry. Mr. Neel Masson, a prominent Copyright Attorney throws light on certain burning issues in the Copyright Act and clarifies the misconceptions.

He says, "There appears to be a popular perception that by way of the amendments the author of literary and musical works incorporated in cinematograph films and/or sound recordings cannot assign their copyright in such works post the amendments of 2012. What the amendments seek to do is retain for the author, only the right to receive royalties for exploitation of the said works, wherever applicable, by providing that an author of the abovementioned classes of works cannot waive or assign the right to receive royalties. The assignability of copyright in such works is not hindered in any manner by the amendments and they remain assignable, wholly or partially, as was the position earlier. It is therefore expected that agreements going forward would factor these elements into the consideration that may be payable to the author.

NEEL MASSON
NEEL MASSON

Furthermore, the right to royalties granted to the authors of literary and musical works is a prospective right and does not cover a right to royalties accrued from works published and /or commissioned prior to the enactment of the Copyright Amendment Act, 2012. This is clear from the wording of the amendments which state that any agreement to the contrary shall be void. This unambiguously refers to agreements to be entered into in the future as an interpretation to the contrary would have the effect of rendering all agreements entered into in the past void which would create havoc in the entertainment industry. In any event, it is a general principle of law that an amendment cannot retrospectively seek to divest an individual of rights which are already vested in him.

In relation to Performers, their rights appear to be assignable but there is an obligation to pay royalties in certain circumstances. In this regard, it is pertinent to note that the Performer's right relate to Performances as defined in the Act and the definition of the term "Performance" has not been changed by the amendments, the ambit of which appears to cover only live performances such as stage shows, concerts etc.."

Neel Mason is the Managing Partner of Mason & Associates, an intellectual property firm specializing in copyrights and trademarks. He has extensive experience in the field of Media and Entertainment Law and regularly advises entities in the entertainment industry. He has also appeared before the Parliamentary Standing Committee which was tasked with making recommendations on the Copyright Amendment Bill.



 
 

 More on Glamsham


- Ansuhka-SRK JAB HARRY MET SEJAL gets U/A certificate - News
- Anushka, SRK, Nargis, Sunny... 6 best dressed celebs of the week - News
- Reliance powers Balaji Telefilms with a 400 crore investment - News
- Shraddha, Kareena, Taapsee, Malaika... 8 worst dressed babes of the week - News
- This is how Akshay Kumar's TOILET: EK PREM KATHA got leaked - News
- Tiger-Nawaz's MUNNA MICHAEL is dull, JAGGA JASOOS manages 46 crore! - News
- TOILET - EK PREM KATHA leak: Akshay Kumar reassures faith in his fans - News
- Lipstick Under My Burkha - Movie Stills
- Aditi Rao Hydari - Picture Gallery
- Aishwarya Rai Bachchan - Picture Gallery
- Anushka Sharma, Imtiaz Ali launch JAB HARRY MET SEJAL first trailer - Picture Gallery
- Babe Of The Day - Picture Gallery
- Best Dressed Of The Week - Picture Gallery
- Bhavana Pani - Picture Gallery
- Deepshikha - Picture Gallery

   News Archives


   Comments

A Fifth Quarter Infomedia Pvt. Ltd. site.