Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

img
Katrina Kaif with sisters in London & internet just had a meltdown!

img
img

Katrina Kaif, the Barbie doll of Bollywood, has been busy with films. She was seen filming, Shah Rukh Khan’s ZERO. Last week, Katrina Kaif, dressed as a traditional Bengali bride, and her candid snaps were all over the internet.

And now Katrina Kaif is having a gala time with her sisters in London. The 34-year-old actress has taken a break from her hectic work schedule to spend some time with her family. Katrina’s social media is a proof that she is having some fun time.

Her fan pages are filled with snaps of her fam jam while her fan clubs shared some more glimpses. One video shows, Katrina and one of her six sisters dancing randomly to peppy music. In another picture, the Kaif sisters, can be seen walking in a picturesque landscape.

Katrina Kaif posted this photo of herself with two of her sisters, which she captioned: "Farm girls."

These snaps are surely too cute and you simply can’t afford to miss it!

Farm girls ????

A post shared by Katrina Kaif (@katrinakaif) on

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sunday be like ???? #sistergoals

A post shared by ? KATRINA KAIF DAILY ? (@katrinakaifdaily) on

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
    SELECT DISTINCT(articleID) AS articleID, articleTitle, imgTagName, seoUri, articleImg, synopsys, articleDesc, authorID, categoryID, articleStatus FROM `fx_article` WHERE status= '1' AND articleID IN(28,80,262,223,186,389,338,311,538,619) AND articleID!='5845' AND articleStatus=1 AND DATE_FORMAT(datePublish, '%Y-%m-%d %H:%i')<='2018-11-17 20:03' ORDER BY datePublish DESC LIMIT 8
    SELECT DISTINCT(articleID) AS articleID, articleTitle, imgTagName, seoUri, articleImg, synopsys, articleDesc, authorID, categoryID, articleStatus FROM `fx_article` WHERE status= '1' AND articleID IN(28,80,262,223,186,389,338,311,538,619) AND articleID!='5845' AND articleStatus=1 AND DATE_FORMAT(datePublish, '%Y-%m-%d %H:%i')<='2018-11-17 20:03' ORDER BY datePublish DESC LIMIT 8
    Expression #1 of ORDER BY clause is not in SELECT list, references column 'gla_200802.fx_article.datePublish' which is not in SELECT list; this is incompatible with DISTINCT